CRWP-4408 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 115 Khushjit Kaur and another State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 to 6. 2. petitioners, namely, Honourjeet Singh was married to Muskan, daughter of respondent no.4 but the said marriage could not survive and there are severe matrimonial differences/dispute respondent nos.4 to 6 are harbo laws of their daughter Muskan to 6. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated (Annexure P- 3. 4. of the respondent 408-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Khushjit Kaur and another Versus State of Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Ms. Shruti Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents Learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioners, namely, Honourjeet Singh was married to Muskan, daughter of respondent no.4 but the said marriage could not survive and there are severe matrimonial differences/disputes between both of them and for this reason, respondent nos.4 to 6 are harbouring a grudge against the petitioners laws of their daughter Muskan. They apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 6. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated -3) to respondent no.2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4408-2025 Decided on:01.05.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents Learned counsel for the petitioners states that son of the petitioners, namely, Honourjeet Singh was married to Muskan, daughter of respondent no.4 but the said marriage could not survive and there are severe between both of them and for this reason, uring a grudge against the petitioners, being in They apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 6. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 22.04.2025 the official respondents only. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents son of the petitioners, namely, Honourjeet Singh was married to Muskan, daughter of respondent no.4 but the said marriage could not survive and there are severe between both of them and for this reason, , being in- They apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 .04.2025 Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.01 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-4408 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the direction to respondent no.2 to decide the representation (Annexure P protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. May 01, 2025 vinod* 408-2025 Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the direction to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Sangrur to decide the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by May 01, 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Senior Superintendent of Police, District Sangrur ) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. ified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary petition with a Senior Superintendent of Police, District Sangrur ) of the petitioners and grant them ified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.01 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document