1 2025:CGHC:12983 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 593 of 2016 1 - Ramsahay S/o Ramprasad Sahu, Aged About 63 Years R/o Village Hanchalpur, Tehsil Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Mahadev S/o Ramprasad Sahu, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Hanchalpur, Tehsil Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ................Plaintiffs, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Daulal S/o Devnath Sahu, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Hanchalpur, Tehsil Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Domelal S/o Toranlal Sahu, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Hanchalpur, Tehsil Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 3 - Virendra S/o Lakhanlal Sahu, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Hanchalpur, Tehsil Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ghanshyam S/o Ramlal Raghuvanshi, Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Hanchalpur, Tehsil Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 5 - Lakhan Mahar S/o Chintaram Mahar, Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Hanchalpur, Tehsil Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 6 - Girdhari Mahar S/o Punuram Mahar, Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Hanchalpur, Tehsil Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI Date: 2025.03.20 12:30:54 +0530 2 7 - Awadhram S/o Dhiruram Jagpal, R/o Village Hanchalpur, Tehsil Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ..............Defendants, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajkumar Pali, Adv. For Respondent(s) : None. SB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board 19.03.2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that as per the information received by the local counsel for the appellants, both the appellants had died. He submits that despite his best efforts, no legal representative of the appellants has contacted him to prosecute the matter further. 2. In the aforesaid circumstances and considering the submission of counsel, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Ajay