Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51169 (AP)

S.GOUSE BASHA v. S.ASMA

CRLRC/179/2019 · 2025-10-12

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010046702019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: Between: 1. S.GOUSE BASHA, D.NO. 1 MANGALAGIRI TOWN, GUNTUR 1. S ASMA, D.NO. 19- GUNTUR 2. SHAIK FAREEHA FATHIMA, REP. BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, I.E RESPONDENT NO.1 3. THE STATE OF AP, HIGH COURT OF AP, AMARVATHI Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V R KRISHNA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P PADMAVATHI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following The Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedural IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 179 OF 2019 S.GOUSE BASHA, D.NO. 1-1168, II LANE, PARK ROAD, MANGALAGIRI TOWN, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER AND -16-80, III LANE, BABIJINAGAR, SANGADIGUNTA, SHAIK FAREEHA FATHIMA, REP. BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, I.E RESPONDENT NO.1 THE STATE OF AP, HIGH COURT OF AP, AMARVATHI ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: K V R KRISHNA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) following Order : The Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedural, aggrieved by the impugned Order passed by the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3521] MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO 2019 1168, II LANE, PARK ROAD, ...PETITIONER 80, III LANE, BABIJINAGAR, SANGADIGUNTA, SHAIK FAREEHA FATHIMA, REP. BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL THE STATE OF AP, HIGH COURT OF AP, AMARVATHI ...RESPONDENT(S): The Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Order passed by the learned Family Court-cum-XII Additional District Judge, Guntur (for brevity ‘the learned Trial Court’), dated 15.11.2018 in Crl.M.P.Ṇo.227 of 2018 in F.C.O.P.No.356 of 2016. 2. A report from the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Guntur has not been submitted. No representation for the Petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondents No. 1 and 2 would submit that on 04.03.2025, ‘the learned Trial Court’ partly allowed the Petition granting Rs. 5,000/- towards maintenance to the Respondent No.2 and rejected the request for grant of maintenance to the Respondent No.1/ wife. In view of disposal of the main FCOP, the Criminal Revision Case, which was filed challenging for grant of interim maintenance to the Respondents No.1 and 2, has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ DR.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO,J Date: 13.10.2025 KK THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 179 OF 2019 13.10.2025 KK