Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51166 (PNJ)

SANDEEP SINGH @ SUNNY v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/24388/2025 · 2025-07-09

Anoop Chitkara

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 214 CRM-M-24388-2025 Date of Decision: 09.07.2025 SANDEEP SINGH @ SUNNY ......... Peoner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present Mr. R.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Akshay Kumar, A.A.G, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) G.D. No. Dated Police Sta3on Sec3ons 18 21.07.2021 Beas, District Amritsar 452, 323, 324, 148, 149 IPC IN FIR No. Dated Police Sta3on Sec3ons 189 19.07.2021 Beas, District Amritsar 326, 452, 148, 149 IPC The peoner apprehending the arrest in the G.D. caponed above, has come up before this Court under Secon 482 BNSS seeking ancipatory bail. 2. State counsel refers para No. 2 of the status report dated 01.07.2025, which reads as follows: 2. That it is humbly submi5ed that the present peon has become infructuous as the peoner has been declared innocent in the present case. 3. Counsel for the peoner submits that the present peon has been rendered infructuous. 4. Given above, the present peon stands disposed of. It is clarified that, in case the peoner requires further invesgaon at any stage, the invesgator is directed to give seven days’ prior noce to the peoner. All pending miscellaneous applicaons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 09.07.2025 Jyo -II Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No. JYOTI 2025.07.11 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.