APHC010228232002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. BATHULA .MOHAN RAO,MANEPALLY,W.G.DISTRICT., S/O. MARINI, R/O. PEDDAPATNAM AGRAHARAM, MANEPALLY (P.O.), MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, RAZOLE, 1. THE A P S R T C HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER, O/O. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPOT MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C., RAZOLE, E.G.DISTRICT. 4. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or orders, direction or directions, writ or writs, particularly one in the natur action of the respondent in not implementing the award to the extent of continuity of service to the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of Constitution of India and Government directions in 12-5-1988 Labour Employment, Nutrition and Technical Education (Labour Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, consequently direct the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14295/2002 BATHULA .MOHAN RAO,MANEPALLY,W.G.DISTRICT., S/O. MARINI, R/O. PEDDAPATNAM AGRAHARAM, MANEPALLY (P.O.), MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, RAZOLE, ...PETITIONER AND THE A P S R T C HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN MANAGING MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. THE DEPUTY CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER, O/O. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT. THE DEPOT MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C., RAZOLE, E.G.DISTRICT. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, ...RESPONDENT( Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or orders, direction or directions, writ or writs, particularly one in the nature of "WRIT OF MANDAMUS" and declare the action of the respondent in not implementing the award to the extent of continuity of service to the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of Constitution of India and Government directions in G.O.Rt.No.798, dt. 1988 Labour Employment, Nutrition and Technical Education (Labour Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, consequently direct the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BATHULA .MOHAN RAO,MANEPALLY,W.G.DISTRICT., S/O. MARINI, R/O. PEDDAPATNAM AGRAHARAM, MANEPALLY (P.O.), ...PETITIONER THE A P S R T C HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN MANAGING THE DEPUTY CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER, O/O. THE REGIONAL THE DEPOT MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C., RAZOLE, E.G.DISTRICT. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or orders, direction or directions, writ or writs, e of "WRIT OF MANDAMUS" and declare the action of the respondent in not implementing the award to the extent of continuity of service to the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article G.O.Rt.No.798, dt. 1988 Labour Employment, Nutrition and Technical Education (Labour-I) Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, consequently direct the 2 respondent to give the benefit of continuity of service to the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 17870 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to give three increments to the petitioner with immediate effect, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition No. of 2002 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K L N SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) 2. . 3 The Court made the following order: Sri K.L.N. Swamy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he came to know that the sole petitioner died and that the particulars of the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner are not available with him. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. If the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner wish to pursue the case, they may file an appropriate application within two (2) months. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 19.09.2025 MP 4 712 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION No.14295 of 2002 Dated : 19.09.2025 MP