WP(C) No.22043 of 2025 ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK WP(C) No.22043 of 2025 An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. *** Radhashyam Mishra … Petitioner. -VERSUS- State of Odisha & Others … Opposite Parties. Counsel appeared for the parties: For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Padhi, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mr. S. Nayak, Addl. Standing Counsel. P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA Date of Hearing : 02.09.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 02.09.2025 WP(C) No.22043 of 2025 JUDGMENT ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.— 1. This writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for directing the Tahasildar, Pipili (O.P. No.2) to carry out (implementation of) the final order dated 18.07.2014 passed in Revision Petition No.64 of 2013 by the Commissioner Consolidation, Odisha, Bhubaneswar. 2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the Opp. Parties 3. The law has already been settled by the Apex Court in the ratio of the decision reported in Jayamma & Others Vrs. Deputy Commissioner, Hassan, Dist., Hassan & Others (Para No.10) reported in III (2013) CLT 94 (SC) that, “if a subordinate authority in the Government does not act in terms of the direction or instruction issued by the superior authority, it is not for the High Court to compel that subordinate authority to comply with the instruction or direction issued by the higher authority of the Government. Because, High Court is not the executing forum of instruction issued by the Government Authorities. It is the duty of the WP(C) No.22043 of 2025 authority of the Government, who passed the order to see that, its order is properly implemented.” 4. So, in view of the above principles of law, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an application annexing the certified copy of this Judgment before the Commissioner Consolidation, Odisha, Bhubaneswar praying for implementation of the final order dated 18.07.2014 passed by it and if after filing of such an application before the Commissioner Consolidation, Odisha, Bhubaneswar, no response is made to the same by the Commissioner Consolidation, Odisha, Bhubaneswar, then, the petitioner can approach the High Court seeking appropriate relief for the same. 5. On the basis of the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is to be disposed of finally. 6. Registry is directed to communicate this Judgment immediately to the Commissioner Consolidation, Odisha, Bhubaneswar in reference to the disposed of Revision Petition No.64 of 2013. WP(C) No.22043 of 2025 7. As such, this writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of finally. (ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) JUDGE High Court of Orissa, Cuttack The 02 .09. 2025// Rati Ranjan Nayak Sr. Stenographer Cuttack, India.