Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5115 (CHH)

KHELU RAM SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/481/2025 · 2025-01-23

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:4151 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 481 of 2025 1 - Khelu Ram Sahu S/o Late Shri Baratu Ram Sahu Aged About 60 Years Sarpanch Of Village Panchayat Banarasi, R/o Ward No. 16, Bharat Mata Chowk, Village Banarasi, P.S. Arang, Janpad Panchayat Arang, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Goverment Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Arang, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Arang, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. J. N. Nande, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer 2 / 2 (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 23/01/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is questioning the order dated 13/12/2024 (Annexure P/1) passed by the SDO (Revenue), Arang, District Raipur whereby the proceeding under Section 40 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (for Short, “the Adhiniyam of 1993”) has been drawn and order of removal from the post of Sarpanch has been passed against the petitioner. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents by raising objection submits that the order passed by the SDO is appealable under the Adhiniyam of 1993 and the same can be challenged before the concerned Collector. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned State counsel, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the said impugned order dated 13/12/2024 (Annexure P/1) before the appellate authority. 4. No objection from the other side. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated supra. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar