Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5114 (UTT)

VIMAL KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/376/2025 · 2025-05-05

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS D/41 ABA No.376 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State. The applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.659 of 2023, dated 19.10.2023, under Sections 120-B, 34, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Today, learned State Counsel, under instructions, gives a statement that till date, the applicant is not wanted in the case. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned State Counsel. Since the applicant is not wanted in the case, nothing survives in this anticipatory bail application. It stands disposed of, accordingly. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 05.05.2025 Sanjay