Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51139 (AP)

G. Ranga Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/25134/2021 · 2025-11-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010409312021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25134/2021 Between: 1. G. RANGA REDDY,, S/O. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. H. NO. 6/78, Y. KOTTAPALLI VILLAGE, ATMAKUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT AT ANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ATMAKUR POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICE, ATMAKUR POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G M SWAMULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in failing to register the petitioner's complaint dated 10.10.2021 before the 4th respondent and the complaint through Central Complaint Cell, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Anantauram dated 12.10.2021 and to investigate the same against the culprits as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of Cr.P.C and consequently direct the respondents to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 10.10.2021 and 12.10.2021 and to take up investigation forthwith and to pass...” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.11.2025 ASR 179 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25134 of 2021 Dt.22.11.2025 ASR