Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010310142021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19052/2021 Between:
1. GALAM SUJITHA,, D/O BALASUBANNA, OCC- STUDENT, AGED- 20 YEARS, R/O D.NO F- 376 V.V. REDDY NAGAR, RTPP YERRAGUNTLA MANDAL, KADADAPA DISTRICT. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 21-95, NAGULAKKATA STREET, JAMMALAMADUGU TOWN, KADAPA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA DISTRICT.A.P.
3. SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT,
4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, YERRAGUNTLA RURAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAMALA POLICE STATION,
YERRAGUNTLA MANDAL,
KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PULIVENDULA TOWN' POLICE STATION, KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P
7. CHIRANJEEVI, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S.I. OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION, PULIVENDULA TOWN, KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. GALAM BALASUBANNA, S/O BALA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PLANT ASSISTANT IN RTPP, R/O D.NO F- 376 V.V. REDDY NAGAR, RTPP YEI-RAGUNTLA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, especially respondents No.3 to No.7 in acting as per the terms and conditions and influence of the respondent no.8 in harassing the petitioner and her husband P. Bangaru Babu and. not giving any protection. even inspite of bringing to the notice of the respondents NO. 2 to 7 about the intension of the respondent no. 8 and her other family members to eliminate them by way of Honor Killing as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Arts, 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the official respondents especially respondent no 2 and 6 not to harass the petitioner and her husband and to grant protection to them and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V NITESH
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2.
SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL
3 THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 19052 of 2021 The Court made the following Order: Sri V.Nitesh, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Dated: 07.10.2025 PSA
4 THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 19052 of 2021
Date: 07.10.2025 PSA