Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 51129 (BOM)
PRANAY S/O KEWALRAM KATANKAR v. SAU. KHUSHABU W/O PRANAY KATANKAR
CAO/659/2022 · 2025-08-22
Shri Pravin S Patil, Smt M S Jawalkar
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51129 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51129 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 915.cao.659.2022 IN THE HIGH
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 659 OF 2022 AND FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST. NO. 11559 OF 2022 Pranay S/O Kewalram Katankar ..vs.. Sau. Khushabu Pranay Katankar - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri U.W. Gupta, Advocate for the applicant.
CORAM: SMT.M.S. JAWALKAR AND PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 22/08/2025. It is seen from the record that despite service of notice, none appeared on behalf of the respondent in the matter.
2. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 40 days in preferring the appeal against the
judgment and decree passed by the Family Court, Bhandara.
3. Considering the reasons stated in the application, which are not controverted, the application is allowed. Delay stands condoned. The application stands disposed of accordingly.
4. The office is directed to register the appeal.
5. After registrationof appeal, issue notice to the respondents, returnable after four weeks.
(PRAVIN S. PATIL
, J.
) (SMT.
M.S. JAWALKAR
, J. ) Trupti