SANJU DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/13396/2025 · 2025-04-30
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51127 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51127 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:68394 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13396 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanju Devi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar,Shree Prakash Giri Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing the respondent no.3 to consider and decide the pending correction application dated 11.12.2023 filed by the petitioner in no 2463/2021 computer case no. T202116670602463, Sanju Devi Vs. Rajmani U/s 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period as deem fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court. (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing the respondent no.2 to expedite the proceeding of case no. 3723/2024, computer case no. T202416670603723 Anurag Vs. Sanju Devi and others U/s 35(2) U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period as deem fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is not pressing prayer no. 1 and confined his argument only for prayer no. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that appeal filed by respondent no. 5 is pending
consideration before respondent no. 2 and prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned appeal, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties and giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.
Order Date :- 1.5.2025/Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad