Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51122 (AP)

Smt. Balem Mangathalli v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/13482/2020 · 2025-09-24

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010206202020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 13482/2020 Between: 1. SMT. BALEM MANGATHALLI ,, W/O. LATE BULLIBBAI, AGE. 54 YEARS R/O C-111 , PANDURU, GOTTIVADA VILLAGE, KOTAURATLA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KOTAURATLA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M SIVA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.13482 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in interfering and trying to disposes the petitioner from the landed property to an extent of Ac.1.52 cents in Sy.No.58 of Gottivada Village, Kotauratla Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, for the purpose of allotting house sites to the poor persons under the scheme of Navaratnalu - Pedalandariki Illu without following principles of natural justice and due process of law as contemplated under the Revenue laws. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the respondent authorities concerned will follow the due procedure with respect to the subject land and there is an interim order of this Court dated 07.08.2020. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 and 3 are directed to deal with the subject land in an extent of Ac.1.52 cents in Sy.No.58 of Gottivada Village, Kotauratla Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, strictly in accordance with law, if so warranted for any public purpose and if the petitioner is otherwise found to be in possession of the same, she shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law, by hearing all the parties concerned, including the petitioner, giving due opportunity, upon verification of 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.13482 of 2020 the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits. Any dispossession from the subject land shall not be made except by following the due process of law. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 25.09.2025 PGT