APHC010654672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 34032/2025 Between: 1. NANNAPANENI NARESH, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 4-2, MANDADAM VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, GUNTUR. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, THULLURU, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THULLURU GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THULLURU POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. KONDIPATI SHANTI, W/O YESU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O THALLAYAPALEM VILLAGE, H/O MANDADAM VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. ALURI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O SURI BABU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC REAL ESTATE BUSINESS, R/O GAYATHRI APARTMENTS, NEAR SBI, MANDADAM VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondent Nos.3 to 5 in interfering with life and liberty of the petitioner and repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station at the instance of respondents 6 and 7 and threatening to implicate in false cases if the petitioner failed to pay the alleged amount due to the 6th respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice and rights guaranteed under Art 21 of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to harass the petitioner, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DIRECT the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to interfere with life and liberty of petitioner and not to harass the petitioner, pending disposal of main Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 34032 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondent Nos.3 to 5 in interfering with life and liberty of the petitioner and repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station at the instance of respondents 6 and 7 and threatening to implicate in false cases if the petitioner failed to pay the alleged amount due to the 6th respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice and rights guaranteed under Art 21 of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to harass the petitioner, and to pass.…” 2. Heard Sri V. Sreenivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that based on the complaint lodged by respondent No.6, a case in Cr.No.221 of 2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 79 r/w 3(5) of BNS was registered against the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law relating to the crime which has been registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.34032 of 2025 Dated.09.12.2025 TVN 268