Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51115 (AP)

D LAKSHMINARAYANA v. SMT DARA NARAYANANNA @ NEELAM NARAYANANNA

CRP/3383/2023 · 2025-12-08

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010634932023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3383/2023 Between: 1. D LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGED 36 YRS S/O DARA CHENNAIAH, R/O D.NO. 6/293-3-AL, NEAR SADAHANAVIDYANIKETAN, VIDYA NAGAR ALUR ROAD. GUNTAKALMANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRIC ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT DARA NARAYANANNA NEELAM NARAYANANNA, AGED 32 YRS. W/O LAKSHMINARAYANA, D/O NEELAMRAMANAIAH R/OD.NO. 12-14, PEDDALRLAPADU VILLAGE, PEDDACHERUVUPALLI (M) KANIGIRITALUK, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523117 2. GOVINDAIAH, , AGED ABOUT 31 YRS, S/O N.ROSAIAH R/OD.NO. 12-26, PEDDALRLAPADU VILLAGE, PEDDACHERUVUPALLI(M) KANIGIRITALUK, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toPleased to set aside the order dated 22.07.2023 passed in H.M.O.P No. 82 of 2022 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Gooty and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2 VS,J C.R.P.No.3383 of 2023 pleased to stay the docket order dated 22.07.2023 in H.M.O.P.No. 82 of 2022 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Gooty pending the present Civil Revision Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. HARISH KUMAR RASINENI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 VS,J C.R.P.No.3383 of 2023 ORDER: When the matter is taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this petition, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 09.12.2025 KGR