M/S PAN MILLENIUM TRADE LINKS LTD v. SRI KRISHNA G SETTY
CRP/493/2019 · 2025-11-04
V Srishananda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51112 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51112 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44463 CRP No. 493 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 493 OF 2019 BETWEEN:
1.
M/S PAN MILLENIUM TRADE LINKS LTD A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY IBNCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.35, VARALAKSHMI COMPLEX, JEEVAN BEEMA NAGAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 075 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI. SUMEET SHARMA.
2.
SRI. SUMEET SHARMA DIRECTOR, M/S. PAN MILLENIUM TRADE LINKS LRD., NO.24-B CROSS, ASHOK AE, MURUGESHPALYA, BENGALURU - 560 017. &PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS MANOHAR KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI. KRISHNA G SETTY S/O LATE GHANTEPPA SETTY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, NO.23, 6TH MAIN, NATARAJ LAYOUT, JP NAGAR 7TH PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 078. &RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K.S, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44463 CRP No. 493 of 2019
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09.08.2019 PASSED ON IA NO.II IN OS NO.7205/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIX ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY DISMISSING THE IA NO.II FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AS NOT MAINTAINABLE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 04.11.2025 stating that the revision petition has become infructuous, which reads as under:
"The petitioners in the above case submit that the above petition has become instructuous and hence the same does not survive to be considered on its merits. Wherefore, the Petitioners pray that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above petition as having become infructuous, in the interest of justice."
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the said memo, the civil revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HDK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20