Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51102 (CHH)

R.K. DUBEY (DEAD) v. PRESIDNET, INDUSTSRIAL COURT OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/1016/2025 · 2025-10-09

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:50674 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1016 of 2025 1 - R.K. Dubey (Dead) S/o Late Shri Ram Kailash Dubey Aged About 60 Years R/o Qr. No. 11b Avenue B2 Type Sector 6, Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) (Dead) Through Lrs. 1.1 - Banshidhar Dubey S/o Late Ram Kumar Dubey (R.K. Dubey) Aged About 67 Years R/o 11b Avenue A, Sector-6, Ward No. 46, Civic Centre Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) 1.2 - Sant Ram S/o Late Ram Kumar Dubey (R.K. Dubey) Aged About 49 Years R/o Rajpur Ekdala, District- Sultanpur (Uttar Pradesh) ... Applicant Versus 1 - Presidnet, Industsrial Court Of Chhattisgarh Near Ghari Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Group General Manager Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd., Bhilai 490001, Tahsil And District- Durg (C.G.) 3 - Chairman-Cum-Managing Director Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd., Shakespear Sarani, 5/1, Kolkata 70 007 At Present 5/1 Commissariat Road Hasting, Kolkata – 700022 4 - Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Steel And Mines New Delhi. ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Mr. Uttam Pandey, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. RS Marhas, Addl. AG For Respondent-UOI : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Dy. S.G. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 10 . 10 .202 5 1. Heard on IA No.01, which is an application seeking permission to bring the LRS of the applicant1 on record. 2. Since the LRs of the deceased-applicant are already brought on SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 record, IA No.01 stands disposed of. 3. Also heard on admission. 4. The application being arguable is admitted for hearing. 5. Issue notice to the non-applicants. Learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents accept notice. 6. With the consent of the parties, heard finally. 7. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of WP-3689-2003, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dt. 28.11.2017. 8. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. WP-3689-2003 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law. 9. Accordingly, the MCC allowed. sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if