APHC010609192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31602/2025 Between: 1. GANTHALA MARIYAMMA, W/O LATE GANTHALA SUDHAKAR R/O 3-101, SANAGALAGUDURU VILLAGE, PUTLUR MANDAL ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-515411 2. GANTHALA LIYANDAR, S/O LATE GANTHALA SUDHAKAR R/O 3- 101, SANAGALAGUDURU VILLAGE, PUTLUR MANDAL ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-515411 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STAE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAM ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 3. THE TAHSILDAR, PUTLUR MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 4. A SURESH BABU, S/O LATE A. NAGARAJU, RESIDENT OF D.NO.1- 613-13-4, CPI COLONY. NANDYAL ROAD, TADIPATRI TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in 2 the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no. 2 in issuing proceedings in D.Dis No. D2(B)/715/2025 dated 10.10.2025 directing deletion of an extent of Ac. 0.06 cents in Sy. no. 1482 of Sanagalaguduru Village now mutated in the name of the 2nd petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of the articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents, particularly official respondents, not to delete the mutation in the name of the 2nd petitioner in respect of an extent of Ac. 0.06 cents in Sy. no. 1482 of Sanagalaguduru Village, in the interest of Justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents, particularly official respondents, not to delete the mutation in the name of the 2nd petitioner in respect of an extent of Ac. 0.06 cents in Sy. no. 1482 of Sanagalaguduru Village and not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioners over the said land. pending the disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to suspend the proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in D.Dis No. D2(B)/715/2025 dated 10.10.2025 directing deletion of an extent of Ac. 0.06 cents in Sy. no. 1482 of Sanagalaguduru Village now mutated in the name of the 2nd petitioner, pending the disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T B L MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed assailing the orders of the 2nd respondent dated 10.10.2025, wherein the 2nd respondent has not considered the documents relied upon by the petitioners and rejected the claim contrary to the records. The fact also remains that both the petitioners as well as the 4th respondent have derived title to the property from one Angadi Subbarayudu, who executed an unregistered will in respect of Ac.0.06 cents in Survey No.1482 of Sanagalaguduru Village. 2. The order of the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) rejecting the claim of the petitioners appears to be contrary to the material on record. Though an enquiry is stated to have been conducted, there is no mention about the receipt relied upon by the petitioners. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 submitted that as against the impugned order, the petitioners have a statutory remedy of revision, but without availing the same, the present writ petition has been filed. 4. Considering the above submissions, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the case, as an alternative remedy is provided under the statute. The petitioners are therefore directed to file a revision before the concerned authority within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4 5. Till disposal of the revision, status quo with regard to the records shall be maintained. 6. As this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter, notice to the 4th respondent is dispensed with. 7. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH 17th November, 2025 cbn 5 303 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH Writ Petition No.31602 of 2025 17th November, 2025 cbn