Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 51099 (BOM)
ASHOK JAGANNATHJI GORE v. SHRI. CHANDRABHAN SOMAJI HEDAU AND ANOTHER
APEAL/393/2014 · 2025-09-29
Shri M M Nerlikar
Criminal Appealbody2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51099 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51099 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 14 apeal 393.14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 393/2014 (Ashok Jagannathji Gore Vs. Shri Chandrabhan Somaji Hedau & anr.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. P.S. Dhenge, Advocate h/f Mr. S.M. Nafde, Advocate for appellant. Mr. K.T. Wagdre, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mrs. S.V. Kolhe, APP for respondent No.2.
CORAM: M. M. NERLIKAR,
J .
DATED : 29/09/2025. Heard.
2. The learned counsel for appellant placed on record the death certificate of respondent No.1 Shri Chandrabhan Somaji Hedau. The said certificate is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.
3. Both the counsel appearing for appellant and respondent No.1 confirmed the death of respondent No.1.
4. As the respondent No.1 is dead, the appeal stands
disposed of as abated against respondent No.1. However, respondent No.2 is a formal.
( M. M. NERLIKAR
, J.)
Gohane