Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51098 (DEL)

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI v. RAJEEV GOEL & ORS.

LA.APP./55/2025 · 2025-12-23

Renu Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LA.APP. 55/2025 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddhartha Goswami, Advocate versus RAJEEV GOEL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S. K. Rout, Ms. Dimple Dham ija, Mr. Aman Mehortra, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Ms. Parmita Nath Ms. Prabhsini Pradhan, Advocates for R-1 to 3 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC with Mr. M. S. Akhtar, Advocate for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR O R D E R % 23.12.2025 CM APPL. 81591/2025 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 81590/2025 3. This is an application filed under Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3 seeking modification of para nos. 6 & 7 of the order dated 09.09.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 submits that due to typographical error, in para nos. 6 & 7 of the order dated 09.09.2025, the words “LRs of the respondents” has been inadvertently mentioned, though the applicants / respondents have filed the same in their personal capacity and there are no LRs and that This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/12/2025 at 12:06:36 the order should be for the release of amount for respondent nos. 1 to 5. Heard. 6. Due to clerical / typographical error, while passing the orders, the relief was ordered for LRs of respondent though it should be for respondent nos. 1 to 3 only. 7. Accordingly, necessary rectification is made in para 6 and 7 of order dated 09.09.2025 which shall now be read as under: - “6. Accordingly, as per the mandate of the judgment of the hon’ble Supreme Court in Kazi Moinuddin Kazi Bashiroddin & Ors. vs. Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation & Anr. ; 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1325, the application is allowed and the 50% of decretal/enhanced amount already deposited by the appellant vide Order dated 20.03.2025 and 21.08.2025 be released along with interest accrued thereon in proportion to the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 on the furnishing indemnity bond, subject to the satisfaction of the Registrar General of this Court, after necessary verification. 7. All the respondents shall remain present before the Registrar General of this Court for this purpose.” 8. This order shall form part and parcel of the order dated 09.09.2025. 9. The application is disposed of in the above terms. RENU BHATNAGAR, J DECEMBER 23, 2025/ms/my This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/12/2025 at 12:06:36