SAU. SONI GAJANAN KALBANDE v. THE TAHSILDAR, CHIKHALDARA, AMRAVATI AND OTHERS
WP/2874/2025 · 2025-06-20
Shri Nitin W Sambre, Shri Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51092 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51092 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
925. WP 2874 of 2025.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2874/2025 Sau. Soni Gajanan Kalbande ...Versus… The Tahsildar, Chikhaldara, Tah. Chikhaldara, Distt. Amravati and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Mr. A.R. Ingole, Advocate for petitioner Mr. A.M. Kadukar, AGP for respondents/State CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 20/06/2025
1. A Pursis along with receipt of payment, dated 19/06/2025, is placed on record by the petitioner, thereby stating that the penalty of Rs.86,500/- is already deposited with the Transport Department towards the overload transportation of minerals. 2. It is not in dispute that the vehicle of the petitioner is already released Yesterday. 3. There is no reason as to why the respondent No.2 should have detained the vehicle of the petitioner that too without any authority of law viz. neither an offence is registered nor an enquiry is conducted. Rather it is for the respondent Nos.1 and 3, who have every right to look into the alleged default committed by the petitioner. 4. However, since the vehicle of the petitioner is already released and it is assured by the Superintendent of
2025:BHC-NAG:5721-DB
925.
WP 2874 of 2025.odt 2 Police, who had appeared in person Yesterday before the Court, that he shall sensitize his officers in serious manner in the matter of illegal detention of the vehicle, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the petition, by accepting the aforesaid assurance from the Superintendent of Police, Amravati. 5. The writ petition is disposed of the accordingly. No order as to costs. (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) Wadkar