Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51091 (CAL)

MD RAISUDDIN v. JOSEPH LORENCE TOBIAS

CPAN/451/2020 · 2025-03-20

Amrita Sinha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20-03-2025 Item no.375 Subrata Bhattacharyya AR(C) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Civil Jurisdiction Appellate Side CPAN No.451 of 2020 Md. Raisuddin -vs- Joseph Lorence Tobias & Anr. with CAN No.1 of 2020 arising out of WPA No.28307 of 2016 Mr. Indranath Mitra Mr. K.P. Mukhopadhyay …for the petitioner Mr. Baidurya Ghosal Mr. Saikat Mukherjee …for the contemnors 1. According to the bank, there is no provision for grant of interest on delayed payment of leave encashment. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to produce any Rule which permits grant of interest on account of delayed payment of leave encashment. 3. Under the circumstances, prayer of the petitioner for grant of interest on account of delayed payment of leave encashment cannot be allowed. 4. The order of the Court appears to be substantially complied with. 5. The contempt application stands disposed of accordingly. 6. Consequently, connected application (CAN No.1 of 2025) is also disposed of. 7. All parties are to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. [Amrita Sinha, J] 2