1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(S) No.1265 of 2025 ----- Md. Ashraf Ali, son of Md. Hussain, resident of Pakariya, PO Pahariya, Ps Paharpur, District-East Champaran, Bihar, at present posted as Assistant Urdu Translator in Palkot Block, PO and PS Palkot, District Gumla, Jharkhand … Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand, Dhurwa, Ranchi 3.The Joint Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand, Dhurwa, Ranchi 4.The Deputy Director, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand, Dhurwa, Ranchi 5.The Deputy Commissioner, Gumla 6.The Block Development Officer, Palkot, Gumla … Respondents. CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. M. Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Lav Kumar Tiwary, AC to AAG-V …...... 02 /12.03.2025: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Assistant Urdu Translator since 1995 but till date since no promotion was given to the petitioner he is entitle to get benefits of ACP/MACP. He submits that in his entire period of service not a single ACP/MACP has been given to the petitioner. 2. It is his contention that he has already represented before the Authorities but they have not taken any step though the competent Authority has forwarded his representation. He submits that suffice it would be if a direction is given at this stage to dispose of representation of the petitioner which has been forwarded to the respondent no. 4. 3. Considering his submission, I direct the respondent no. 4 to dispose of the representation of the petitioner considering his submissions. If it is found that the petitioner is eligible to get ACP/MACP, the same will be placed before the appropriate Authorities/Committee who will take a decision. If the decision is in favour of the petitioner he should be given all the monetary benefits. If the claim of the petitioner is dismissed or rejected at any stage by any 2 of the Authorities, the reasons thereof be communicated to the petitioner. 4. The entire process should be concluded within 12 weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order. 5. This writ petition is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/