IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AM THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY lf$ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 102 OF 2019 Between: 1. Thota Soundaryamma, W/o. Venkatakrishnaiah (C.1), aged about 70 years, R/o. Kulluru Village, Kaluvay Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 2. Yagiteela Ramanaiah, DIED, S/o. Gerataiah (C.2 died) (LRs of this claimant are shown as appellant Nos. 8 and 9) (As per Court order dated 25.06.2019 in I.A.No.3 of 2019 in LAAS No.102 of 2019 grant leave to the petitioner Nos. 8 to 10 as LRs of deceased appellant Nos. 2 and 7.) 3. V.Kamalamma, W/o. Sangameswara Rao (C.3), aged about 64 years. Agriculturist, R/o. Thurumella Village, Thenali Mandal, Guntur District. 4. Chemarthi Subbamma, w/o. Subbarayuduraju, (C. 4) alias Subbarayudu, agriculturist, aged about 62 years, R/o. 25/2/76, Dargamitta, Nellore Town and District. 5. Muppalla Saradakumari, (C.5) Muppalla Saralakumari, (as per Award) D/o. Narasimharaju, aged about 45 years, R/o. Nellore Town and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 6. M. Rajasekhara raju, S/o. Bhagavannarayana Raju (C.6) aged about 53 years, agriculturist, R/o. Arimanipadu village, Ojili Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 7. K. Vimalamma, DIED, W/o. Venkata Raju (C.7 died) (LR. of this claimant is shown as appellant No. 10) (As |Der Court order dated 25.06.2019 in I.A.No.3 of 2019 in LAAS No.102 of 2019 grant leave to the petitioner Nos. 8 to 10 as LRs of deceased appeltant Nos. 2 and 7.) - e-' 8. Singamsetty Sirisha, W/o. Prasad(LR of C.2) aged about 38 years, R/o. Navalakula thota Village, Nellore Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 9. Murarisetty lakshmibhavani, W/o. Raghavalu (LR of C.2) aged about 38 years, R/o. Navalakula Thota Village, Nellore Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. Konduru Sreenivasa Raju, S/o. Venkataraju (LR of C.7) aged about 43 years, agriculturist, R/o. Arimanipadu village, Ojili Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 10. ...APPELLANTS/ PROPOSED LR’s of C. 2 & 7 AND The Special Deputy Collector, (Land Acquisition) Telugu Ganga Project, Rapur at Nellore. ...RESPONDENT/ REFERRING OFFICER Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, aggrieved by the decree and common order of the Senior Civil Judge, Guduru dated 23- 06-2005 passed in LAOP No. 28/1997 This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of Sri Chetiuru Sreenivas, for the Appellants, and GP for Land acquisition(AP), for the Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the Appeal be and hereby is Allowed; 2. That the compensation for each tree be and is hereby enhanced as follows a. Pomegranate trees b. Lime trees c. Drumstick trees d. Coconut trees :Rs.3,000/- per tree Rs.3,000/- per tree Rs.2,000/- per tree Rs.3,000/- per tree e. Regu tree [RedLemon] :Rs. 400/- per tree f. Soap-nut trees g. Tamarind tree h. Mango tree :Rs.5,000/- per tree :Rs.6,000/- per tree ;Rs.3,000/- per tree That the appellant shall pay the Court fee on the enhanced compensation amount; That the appellant is not entitled to interest during the period of delay in preferring the appeal after disposal of the L.A.O.P by the Reference Court; That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. 3. 4. 5. Sd/- E. KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge[Senior Division], Guduru, SPSR Nellore District 2. Three CD Copies MV RAM HIGHCOURT DATED: 01/05/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.102 of 2019 §( 0 9 JUL im irentSe CoJ ★ a ALLOWING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 102 OF 2019 Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, aggrieved by the decree and common order of the Senior Civil Judge, Guduru dated 23-06- 2005 passed in LAOP No. 28/1997 Between: 1. Thota Soundaryamma, W/o. Venkatakrishnaiah (0.1), aged about 70 years, R/o. Kulluru Village, Kaluvay Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 2. Yagiteela Ramanaiah, DIED, S/o. Gerataiah (C.2 died) (LRs of this claimant are shown as appellant Nos. 8 and 9) (As per Court order dated 25.06.2019 in I.A.No.3 of 2019 in LAAS No.102 of 2019 grant leave to the petitioner Nos. 8 to 10 as LRs of deceased appellant Nos. 2 and 7.) 3. V.Kamalamma, W/o. Sangameswara Rao (C.3), aged about 64 years. Agriculturist, R/o. Thurumella Village, Thenali Mandal, Guntur District. 4. Chemarthi Subbamma, w/o. Subbarayuduraju, (C. 4) alias Subbarayudu, agriculturist, aged about 62 years, R/o. 25/2/76, Dargamitta, Nellore Town and District. 5. Muppalla Saradakumari, (C.5) Muppalla Saralakumari, (as per Award) D/o. Narasimharaju, aged about 45 years, R/o. Nellore Town and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 6. M. Rajasekhara raju, S/o. Bhagavannarayana Raju (C.6) aged about 53 years, agriculturist, R/o. Arimanipadu village, Ojili Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 7. K. Vimalamma, DIED, W/o. Venkata Raju (C.7 died) (LR. of this claimant is shown as appellant No. 10) (As per Court order dated 25.06.2019 in I.A.No.3 of 2019 in LAAS No.102 of 2019 grant leave to the petitioner Nos. 8 to 10 as LRs of deceased appellant Nos. 2 and 7.) 8. Singamsetty Sirisha, W/o. Prasad(LR of C.2) aged about 38 years, R/o. Navalakula Thota Village, Nellore Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 9. Murarisetty lakshmibhavani, W/o. Raghavalu (LR of C.2) aged about 38 years, R/o. Navalakula Thota Village, Nellore Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. Konduru Sreenivasa Raju, S/o. Venkataraju (LR of C.7) aged about 43 years, agriculturist, R/o. Arimanipadu village, Ojili Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 10. ...APPELLANTS/ PROPOSED LR’s of C. 2 & 7 AND The Special Deputy Collector, (Land Acquisition) Telugu Ganga Project Rapur at Nellore. ...RESPONDENT/ REFERRING OFFICER Counsel for the Appellants; SRI. CHETLURU SREENIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following; APHC011430042016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION FIRST APPEAL No. 102/2019 [3526] BETWEEN: Thota Soundaryamma, and others ...Appellant(s) AND ...Respondent The Special Deputy Collector Counsel for the Appellant(S); 1.CHETLURU SREENIVAS Counsel for the Respondent: 1.GPFOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT No. 102 OF 2019 JUDGMENT: {Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya) The land of the claimants was acquired by the respondent authorities of Telugu Ganga Project for foreshore submersion of Kandaleru Reservoir. Aggrieved by the fixation of low and small amount for the trees, the appellants-claimants have received the compensation on protest and requested to refer the award to the Civil Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (for short the Act). Accordingly, the award was referred and registered as L.A.O.P.No.28 of 1997 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Guduru. On considering the evidence, both oral and documentary, the Reference Court has answered the reference by enhancing the compensation for trees. 2. Dissatisfied with the compensation granted to the appellants for Lime trees and with regard to rejection of enhancement of compensation for Pomegranate, Drumstick, Coconut, Regu, Soapnut, Tamarind and Mango trees vide order in L.A.O.P.No. 28 of 1997 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Guduru, dated 23.06.2005, the 3 Vt present L.A.A.S.No. 102 of 2019 came to be filed seeking enhancement of the compensation of the trees. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants would submit that this Court, the composite High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad and the Hon’ble Apex Court have fixed the rate for pomegranate trees @ Rs.3,000/- per tree and for mango trees @ Rs.3,000/- per tree and for coconut trees @ Rs.3,000/- per tree and for sweet orange trees (cheeni trees) @ Rs.4,000/- per tree and hence urged this Court to enhance the compensation for the aforesaid trees and to pass the same r 3. orders in the present appeal. The appellants relied on the judgment of this Court in a batch of appeals vide L.A.A.S.No.35 of 2019 and batch dated 27.09.2023, L.A.A.S.No.61 of 2022 and batch dated 05.10.2023, L.A.A.S.No.31 of 2019 dated 27.06.2019 and L.A.A.S.No.2 of 2023 dated 04.09.2023, and also the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in D.Eswara Naidu & Vs. the Special Deputy Collector (LA.) in Civil Appeal No. 11355 of 2018 dated 20.11.2018, the judgment of the composite High Court in The Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Somasila Project, Unit-IV, Rajampet, Kadapa, Kadapa District Vs. Peddireddy Madhava Reddy and others. In the said judgment, the composite High Court has fixed Rs.3,000/- per each mango tree, acid lime tree, coconut tree, guava, jack-fruit and sapota (sapodilla) and also for the trees of 4. ors. 4 pomegranate, drumstick and neredu (black-plum), and so far as the tamarind and soap-nut are concerned, the Court has fixed Rs.6,000/- and Rs.5,000/- respectively for each tree. 5. Learned counsel for the appellants further relied on the judgment of this Court in LAAS No.28 of 2019 and batch dated 05.11.2019, LAAS No.61 of 2023, LAAS No.63 of 2022 and the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court in Pidugu Kondala Rayudu i/. Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project Unit, Kadapa\ The Hon’ble Apex Court in D. Eswara Naidu & Ors., versus The Special Deputy Collector(O.Af dated 20.11.2018, inter alia held as follows: “2. The issue raised in these appeals pertains to the claim made by the appellants for enhancement of compensation for pomegranate trees, which stood in the land acquired for the purpose of Somashila/Telugu Ganga Project. The notifications in these cases have been issued on different dates between 1990 to 1994. The appellants have been granted compensation at the rate of Rs.2000/- per Pomegranate Tree. We find from Civil Appeal Nos.11404-11405 of 2016 that this Court has fixed compensation at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per pomegranate tree against the Rs.2000/- fixed by the High Court, in respect of the acquisition for the same project, for which notification was issued in the year 1994. , as Having regard to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that it would be just, reasonable and proper to fix the compensation at the rate of ' 2012 (12) see 848 ^2019 (13) see 785 5 Rs.3,000/- per Pomegranate Tree. Therefore, these appeals are disposed of with the following directions: The appeliants shall be entitled to compensation at the rate of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand) per Pomegranate Tree along with all statutory benefits. However, they shall not be entitled to statutory interest for the period of delay in approaching this Court or the High Court. The compensation to the claimants shall be made within three months from today.” (i) (ii) (iii) 6. In the judgment rendered in LAAS No.417 of 2008, a Division Bench of this Court granted compensation in respect of trees, in the following manner: Mango, Acid Lime, Coconut, Guava, Jack-fruit & Sapota (Sapodilla) Tamarind Cheeni (Sweet Orange) Soap-nut Cashew nut trees Drumstick & Neredu (Black-plum) Dates & Palmyra trees Remaining trees Pomegranate tree Rs.3,000/- per tree Rs.6,000/- per tree Rs.4,000/- per tree Rs.5,000/- per tree Rs.2,500/- per tree Rs.2,000/- per tree Rs. 300/- per tree Rs. 400/- per tree Rs.3,000/- per tree 7. In Civil Appeal No.2947 of 2022, the Hon’ble Apex Court has fixed compensation for the pomegranate trees @ Rs.3,000/- per tree, following the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in D.Eswara Naidu & 6 ors Vs. The Special Deputy Collector (LA.) (referred supra), in Civil Appeal No.11355 of 2018 in respect of the very same project. Learned Government Pleader for Appeals has relied on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Ashok Kumar and another Vs. State of Haryana. The said judgment does not pertain to the valuation of the trees. The issue in the present appeal pertains to the valuation of the trees. Hence, the said judgment is not applicable to the present facts of the case. 8. 9. Learned Government Pleader for Appeals further stated that the trees existed were pre-bearing trees (plants) and accordingly the value was fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court has rightly answered the said issue and stated that the appellants are not entitled for the enhancement of compensation on the basis of the judgments relied on by the learned counsel for the appellants, as they are pre-bearing trees. Hence, urged this Court to dismiss the appeal filed under Section 54 of the Act, as the appellants are not entitled for any enhancement of compensation. 10. In the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in D.Eswara Naidu & ors Vs. The Special Deputy Collector (LA.) (referred supra) in Civil Appeal No.11355 of 2018, the Hon’ble Apex Court has fixed the rate for the pomegranate trees and other trees for the very same 7 Somasila/Telugu. Ganga Project @ Rs.3,000/- as against Rs.2,000/- and held that the appellants are entitled to compensation @ Rs.3,000/- for pomegranate tree along with all statutory benefits and also further observed that every appellant is not entitled to statutory interest for the period of delay in approaching the High Court. The Court did not make a distinction between fruit-bearing and pre-bearing trees. Therefore, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of orders mentioned above for increasing of compensation for pomegranate trees. The compensation was fixed in respect of each Lime, Coconut and Mango trees @ Rs.3,000/- per tree; Drumstick trees @ Rs.2,000/- per tree; Regu trees @ Rs.400/- per tree; Soap-nut trees @ Rs.5000/- per tree and Tamarind trees @ Rs.6,000/- per tree in L/\AS No.417 of 2008. Learned Government Pleader for Appeals has disputed about the 11. number of trees. Therefore, this Court is inclined to allow the appeal on fair admission made by the learned counsel for the appellants that the compensation may be enhanced as per the number of trees as identified by the Land Acquisition Officer in the award, as the appellants are not insisted for grant of compensation for the number of trees which is pleaded by the appellants in the appeal. Therefore, it is made clear that the appellants are entitled to compensation for the total number of trees as identified by the Land Acquisition Officer in the award and not 8 on the total number of trees as the appellants claimed in the Reference V Court. As the claim is only with regard to the trees, the present appeal is allowed, enhancing the compensation for each tree as detailed below: 12. Rs.3,000/- per tree Rs.3,000/- per tree Rs.2,000/- per tree Rs.3,000/- per tree Rs. 400/- per tree Rs.5,000/- per tree Rs.6,000/- per tree Rs.3,000/- per tree Pomegranate trees Lime trees Drumstick trees Coconut trees Regu tree & Red Lemon Soap-nut trees Tamarind tree Mango tree 13. The appellants shall pay the Court fee on the enhanced compensation amount. The appellants are not entitled to interest during the period of delay in preferring the appeal after disposal of the L.A.O.P. by the Reference Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. Sd/- E. KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// N OFFICER SEC To, SPSR Nellore District [with Civil Judge [Senior Division], Guduru 1. The records if any] 2 One CC to Sri Chetluru Sreenivas, Advocate [OPUC] ^ . CCS to GP for Land Acquisition, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 3. Two [OUT] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Amaravati 5. The Section Officer Pradesh at Amaravati 6. Three CD Copies Court of Andhra Pradesh at New Wing Section, Civil wing. High Court of Andhra MV RAM HIGH COURT DATED: 01/05/2025 JUDGMENT + DECREE LAAS.No.102 of 2019 0 9 JUL 2025 O Co .>4^entSec TV\E. \_^KS V\/\THOUT COSTS