SMT.MALIYAMMA W/O. LATE YERRISWAMY v. SRI.B.RAMU S/O. B ANJINAPPA
MFA/100810/2019 · 2025-02-06
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5108 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5108 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100810 OF 2019 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. MALIYAMMA W/O. LATE YERRISWAMY GIDDA YERRISWAMY, AGE:42 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
2.
SMT. GOURAMMA W/O G. ANJINAPPA, AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
3.
SMT. LAKSHAMI D/O. LATE YERRISWAMY @ GIDDA YERRISWAMY, AGE: 18 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
4.
MINOR Y. YERIYAMMA D/O. ALTE YERRISWAMY @ GIDDA YERRISWAMY, AGE: 17 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
5.
MINOR NIRMALA D/O. LATE YERRISWAMY @ GIDDA YERRISWAMY, AGE: 16 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
6.
MINOR CHANDRAKALA D/O. LATE YERRISWAMY @ GIDDA YERRISWAM, AGE: 14 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT.
7.
MINOR Y. NAGARAJ S/O. LATE YERRISWAMY @ GIDDA YERRISWAMY, AGE: 13 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
2
8.
MINOR Y. SIDDAMMA D/O. LATE YERRISWAMY @ GIDDA YERRISWAMY, AGE: 12 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
THE APPELLANTS NO.4 TO 8 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT. MALIYAMMA W/O. LATE YERRISWAMY GIDDA YERRISWAMY.
ALL ARE R/O. NAGAPPA CAMP KARIGANURU, HOSAPETE TALUK NOW RESIDENT AT TARANAGAR VILLAGE SANDUR TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT -583101. ...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. S.M. KALWAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 .
SRI. B.RAMU S/O. B ANJINAPPA AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. WARD NO.3, P K HALLI VILLAGE, HOSAPETE, TALUK BALLARI DISTRICT -583101.
2 .
M/S ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, STATION ROAD HOSAPETE- 583201.
... RESPONDENTS
* * * * *
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 passed in MVC No.883/2017 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-VI, Kudligi.
3 This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following;
O R D E R
Finally four weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE
//COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 25.03.2025, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No.100810 of 2019 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated
06.02.2025.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.
T By: gtb
C By: VK