SMT. MAMTA (RIDHI) KANAUJE v. DONGENDRA KUMAR KANAUJE
MCC/1003/2025 · 2025-10-07
Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51060 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51060 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:50031
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1003 of 2025 1 - Smt. Mamta (Ridhi) Kanauje W/o Dongendra Kumar Kanauje Aged About 24 Years R/o Kanchan Ganga, Phase - 2, Daganiya Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Shivansh Kinuaje S/o Dongendra Kumar Kanauje Aged About 2 Years R/o C/o Kanchan Ganga, Phase - 2, Daganiya Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.)
... Applicants versus 1 - Dongendra Kumar Kanauje S/o Taman Lal Kanauje Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Cherkapur Thana Palari, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.)
... Respondent (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Applicants : None. For Respondent : None. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 08/10/2025
1. This is an office reference. RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.10.08 16:47:52 +0530
2
2. Vide PUD dated 21.08.2025, 1st Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) has sought further extension of time to dispose of Civil Suit No. HMA/168-A/2024 after transferred from Judge, Family Court, Balodabazar, Disrict Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) newly registered as Civil Suit No. HMA/335/2025 (Dogendra Kumar Kanauje vs. Smt. Mamta (Ridhhi) Kanauje), which was directed to be disposed of as early as possible, preferably within four months from the date of receipt of the record from the transferring Court vide order dated 28.03.2025 passed in TPC No.39/2025 (Smt. Mamta (Ridhhi) Kanauje and Another vs. Dongendra Kumar Kanauje) by this Court.
3. Considering the reasons mentioned in the request letter, further time of four months from today i.e. 08.10.2025 is granted with regard to disposal of the case mentioned herein above. It is further directed to the concerned Family Court to take strict view, if adjournment is sought by any of the parties.
4. Accordingly, MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi