Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51060 (AP)

Bharadwaja Kameswara Singh, v. Sri.P.Ranjith Basha, I.A.S.,

CC/1586/2025 · 2025-11-04

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010260912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1586 OF 2025 Between: 1. Bharadwaja Kameswara Singh,, S/o. Bharadwaja Bhagavan Singh, aged 57 years, Occ.Business, R/o.H.No.850-760-A-127,Gayathri Estates, B.K.Singh Houses,Kurnool City, Kurnool District. ...Petitioner AND 1. Sri P Ranjith Basha I A S, District Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 2. Sri Shaik Mohammed Ali, Chief Executive Officer (FAC), Andhra Pradesh State Waqf Board, Imdadghar, 4th Floor,Kaleswara Rao Market, Vijayawada- 520 001. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: CHALLA SIVASANKAR Counsel for the Respondents: MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO Counsel for the Respondents:SHAIK KHAJA BASHA The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Challa Siva Sankar, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioner, Smt. Sushma Yaganti, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1 and Sri Shaik Khaja Basha, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2. 2. The present Contempt Case is filed complaining non-compliance of the Order dated 06.08.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16913 of 2024. 2 3. Shaik Khaja Basha, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2 has filed a Memo on 29.10.2025 along with certain documents. The Proceeding dated 01.08.2025 would indicate that the said Respondent has issued Endorsement on 30.04.2025. Learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioner contends that the said Endorsement, although it is dated 30.04.2025, was served to the Petitioner only on 01.08.2025, therefore, there is gross delay on the part of the Respondent No.2 in complying the Order of this Court. 4. In view of the compliance of the Order of this Court, as stated above, this Contempt Case is closed. Needless to state that the Contempt Petitioner herein is at liberty to challenge the Endorsement dated 30.04.2025, if so advised. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 05.11.2025 JKS 3 100 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1586 OF 2025 05.11.2025 JKS