CHANDRAPRATAP TIWARI @ CHANDU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
CRMP/3482/2024 · 2025-01-01
Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51055 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51055 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:18-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3482 of 2024 1 - Chandrapratap Tiwari @ Chandu S/o Shri Mithailal Tiwari Aged About 47 Years R/o Gram Godi, Post Dagori, Tahsil Bilha, Dist. Bilaspur, C.G.
... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through, Police Station Chakarbhatha, Dist. Bilaspur, C.G.
... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Sakib Ahmad, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board Per
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
02/01/2025
1. Heard Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Sakib Ahmad, Panel Lawyer for the Respondent/State.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:
"It is therefore prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/ set aside the FIR No. 230/2024 (Annexure A2) along with all subsequent proceedings thereform with respect to the applicant,
2 in the interest of justice."
3. The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that though the FIR has been lodged in May, 2024, but the matter is still under investigation and no Police Report under Section 193 of BNSS, have been submitted, but there appears to be no such averments made in the present petition. Moreover the prayer which has been made in the present petition is also defective one as there is no mention of the date on which the FIR has been registered nor the offences or the police station or the district has been mentioned.
4. In view of the above, the present petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file afresh making proper prayer and due averment regarding the details of FIR.
5. Certified copy, if any, filed in the petition be return back to the petitioner after retaining its attested true copy.
Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok