APHC010480012010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 15358/2010 Between: 1. TATA SAMBAIAH, S/O.KOTAIAH CULTIVATION R/O. ATMAKURU VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF A P REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENTS, TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENTS GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENTS GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. SRI VENUGOPALASWAMI VARI TEMPLE, ATMAKURU VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUTNUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI GROUP TEMPLES, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to direct the 4th respondent to continue the petitioner to do cultivation for the Crop Year 2010-2011 pertaining to the 4th respondent's Temple Land, situated in D.no. 71 admeasuring Ac. 7.00 at Atmakuru Village, 2 Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District by taking remaining lease amount of Rs. 1,94,700/- on installments basis and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WVMP 5287 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order passed in WPMP No. 19341 of 2010 in WP No. 15358 of 2010, dated 20-7-2010 IA NO: 2 OF 2010(WPMP 19341 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to dispossess the petitioenr from the 4th respondent's Temple Land situated in D.No. 71 admeasuring Ac. 7.00 at Atmakuru Village, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2010(WPMP 21967 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased implead the Proposed 5th Respondent herein as 5th Respondent in W.P.No.15358 of 2010 and in all other Writ Petition Miscellaneous Petitions and pass. IA NO: 4 OF 2010(WPMP 36005 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased implead the Proposed 6th Respondent herein as 6th Respondent in the present WPMP, seeking direction to the 6th Respondent to give Police Protection and pass IA NO: 7 OF 2010(WPMP 90960 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 8 OF 2010(WPMP 90962 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 13 OF 2010(WPMP 148037 OF 2010 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 15 OF 2010(WVMP 148335 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WVMP 2364 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders granted in WPMP No. 19341 of 2010 in WP No. 15358 of 2010 dtr; 20.07.2010 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RAMA KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SEETHIRAJU SRIDHAR RAO 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following Order: Heard Sri K. Rama Koteswara Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the writ petitions would not survive for adjudication and no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petitions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date:04.12.2025 JAK 5 THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA 59 WRIT PETITION No.15358 of 2010. Date:04.12.2025 JAK