V. Raghupathi Naidu, S/o Venkatamuni Naidu, v. The Government of India
WP/171/2015 · 2025-12-08
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51041 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51041 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010385252015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 171/2015 Between:
1. V. RAGHUPATHI NAIDU, S/O VENKATAMUNI NAIDU, , OCC:
AGRICULTURE, R/O: NH-4, MBT MAIN ROAD, BANGARUPALYAM POST & MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS DEPUTY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI. 2. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY CUM SUPERINTENDENT, ENGINEER, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, -
4. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITYCUMREVENUE, DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR REVENUE DIVISION, CHITTOOR. 5. THE DEPUTY ENGINEER, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, OPP. ZP OFFICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, BANGARUPALYAM MANDAL, BANGARUPALYAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly,
2
one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in trying to demolishing the Petitioner's structures and trees by dispossessing him without considering the objections for the purpose of acquiring the lands for extension of National Highway No.4 without giving any notification, without paying the compensation, without giving any prior notice, without giving any cutting order to sever the trees on the Petitioner's lands in Sy.No.210,211,215 and 216 extent of the land is Ac 21.71 Cents of Bangarupalyam Village, Bangarupalyam Mandal, Chittoor district is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 14.16, and 21 of the Constitution of India and against the principles of the natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents not to acquire the Petitioner's lands for extension of National Highway No.4 in Sy.No.210,211,215 and 216 extent of the land is Ac 21.71 Cents of Bangarupalyam Village, Bangarupalyam Mandal, Chittoor district IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 184 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of dispossession of the petitioner in Sy. No. 210, 211, 215 and 216 extent of the land is Ac.21.71 cents of Bangarupalyam Village & Mandal, Chittoor District. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CH VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS (AP)
3
The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dt.09.12.2025 SSA
4