Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51036 (AP)

MALLALA SUBBA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/10011/2021 · 2025-09-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010175192021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10011 OF 2021 Between: 1. MALLALA SUBBA RAO, S/o Yedukondalarao, aged about 37 years, Occ . Agriculture, R/o. Door No 19-15-133/A, IPD Colony, 1st Lane, Sangadigunta, Guntur, 'Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, Kurnool District, at Kurnool. 3. THE STATION OF HOUSE OFFICER, I Town Police Station, Srisailam. Kurnool District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in providing police protection to the Petitioner in pursuance of the representation made by the Petitioner dt. 20.04.2021 is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to provide police protection to the Petitioner in pursuance of the representation made by the Petitioner dt. 20.04.2021, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to forthwith provide police protection to the Petitioner in pursuance of the representation made by the Petitioner dt.20.04.2021, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: G KONDALA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10011 OF 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in providing police protection to the Petitioner in pursuance of the representation made by the Petitioner dt. 20.04.2021 is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to provide police protection to the Petitioner in pursuance of the representation made by the Petitioner dt. 20.04.2021, and pass...…” 2. Heard Sri G.Kondala Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.09.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.10011 of 2021 Dated.2209.2025 KKV