HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU OWP No. 1093/2004 c/w OWP No. 1142/2009 WP(C) No. 2872/2023 Parshotma Devi & Ors. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. vs Union of India & Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Sandeep Gupta, CGSC. Mr. Vinayak Phull, Advocate for R-4 in WP(C) No. 2872/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER (29.05.2025) OWP No. 1093/2004 (Parshotma Devi & Ors vs. U.O.I. & Ors.) 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners and so was the case on previous two dates as well, which suggests that the petitioners have lost their interest to prosecute this petition any further. 2. Dismissed for non-prosecution, along with connected application(s). 3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. OWP No. 1142/2009 (Parshotma Devi & Ors vs. U.O.I. & Ors.) 4. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners and so was the case on previous two dates as well, which suggests that the petitioners have lost their interest to prosecute this petition any further. 5. Dismissed for non-prosecution, along with connected application(s). 6. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. Serial No.26 2 OWP No. 1093/2004 c/w OWP No. 1142/2009 WP(C) No. 2872/2023 WP(C) No. 2872/2023 (Shakti Devi & Anr. vs. U.O.I. & Ors.) 7. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners and so was the case on previous two dates as well, which suggests that the petitioners have lost their interest to prosecute this petition any further. 8. Dismissed for non-prosecution, along with connected application(s). 9. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE Jammu 29.05.2025 Vishal Sharma