( 2025:JHHC:11462 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S). No. 1828 of 2025 ---- Dr. Deo Kumar Mandal, aged about 73 years, son of late Parmeshwar Mandal, resident of House No.21, Indra Nagar, Kanke Road, P.O Ranchi University, P.S. Gonda, District-Ranchi .......Petitioner Versus 1. Ranchi University, Ranchi through its Vice-Chancellor, P.O. GPO, P.S.Kotwali, District-Ranchi 2. Registrar, Ranchi University, Ranchi, PO GPO, P.S. Kotwali, District-Ranchi 3. Director, Department of Higher, Technical Education and Skill Development, Directorate of Higher Education, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, P.O and P.S- Doranda, District-Ranchi .....Respondents --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Altaf Hussain, Advocate : Mr. Afaque Ahmed, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate --- 04/ Dated: 16.04.2025 1. The instant writ application has been preferred by the Petitioner to consider the case of his deceased wife who was working with the Respondents and grant him the arrears of difference of 6th pay scale from 01.10.2008 to 31.03.2010 amounting to Rs.2,44,316/- along with interest which is lying with the Respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that earlier the Petitioner had moved before this Court in W.P(S) No. 1532 of 2021 which was disposed of on 17.08.2022, whereby the Respondents were directed to release actual monetary benefits in favour of this Petitioner. He further submits that pursuant to the said order, an amount of Rs.17,89,341/- has been paid to this petitioner; however, as per the Petitioner there is some calculation error with regard to the benefits that is to say: the amount for certain period has not been paid for which he has already made a representation (Annexure-8) which is still pending. ( 2025:JHHC:11462 ) 3. Learned counsel for the Respondents fairly submits that they will verify the issue and if at all any admitted amount is left to be paid, the same shall be paid. 4. Having regard to the fair submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the 2nd Respondent to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision with respect to the claim of the Petitioner made in the instant writ application and pass an order and if any amount still remains to be paid to the petitioner, the same shall be paid to him. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order. The Petitioner is also directed to serve the copy of this writ application along with this order to the 2nd Respondent at the earliest. 5. As a result, the instant writ application stands disposed of in the manner indicated hereinabove. Abha/ (Deepak Roshan, J.)