1 2025:CGHC:51124 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1355 of 2025 • Rajendra Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Jagdev Prasad Sahu, Aged About 58 Years R/o Kali Murti Road, Sharda Chowk, New Changorabhatta, Raipur, Tehsil And District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House, Police Station - Tikrapara, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chandra Shekhar Markam S/o Shri Vinod Kumar Markam Aged About 34 Years R/o House No. 340, Mandal Gali, Kharkona, Takhatpur- Hirri Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Mr. Palash Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Dubey, Government Advocate For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Dilesh Kumar Kurre, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 14.10.2025 1. The is the second bail application filed by the applicant under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail, who has apprehension of being arrested in connection with Crime No. 470/2022 registered at Police Station - Tikrapara, District - Raipur (C.G.) for commission of MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.10.15 11:48:53 +0530 2 offence under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2. The first bail application filed by the applicant bearing MCRCA No. 549 of 2023 has been dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file regular bail application by this Court vide order dated 27.06.2023 . 3. The prosecution story in brief is that the complainant filed a complaint alleging that the complainant has paid Rs. 35,00,000/- to the applicant for purchase of old car and the amount of Rs. 35,00,000/- has been deposited on various dates to his bank account, but he has not provided the car, therefore, he has filed a complaint and after due verification aforesaid, offence has been registered against the applicant and charge-sheet has also been submitted. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that now the applicant and the complainant have already settled the dispute and entire amount of Rs. 35,00,000/- is paid to the complainant by the applicant. 5. The complainant has appeared in person before this Court and also filed an affidavit informing that the amount of Rs. 35,00,000/- has already been paid by the applicant and the complainant has no objection in releasing the applicant on bail. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary with utmost satisfaction. 7. Considering the settlement arrived between the parties and statement of the complainant, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail. 3 8. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with the aforesaid offence, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail by the officer arresting on executing a personal bond in sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer. The Applicant shall also abide by the following conditions:- (i) That the applicant shall make herself/himself available for interrogation before the concerned police officer as and when required; (ii) That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat undue influence to the prosecution witnesses; (iii) That the applicant shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish