i IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE>^ONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2106 OF 2005 Appeal under section 173 of MV Act, aggrieved by the Decree and Order dated 30.06.2005 passed by the VII Additional District Judge-cum-Motor vehicles accidents Tribunal, Visakhapatnam in MOP No.66 of 2004 Between: Lodagala Appayyamma, W/o Pothayya, aged 36 years, Hindu, Female, Agriculturist & Vegetable Vendor, R/o Lodagalavanipalem, Anandapuram Mandal, Visaskhapatnam. ...APPELLANT / PETITIONER AND 1. V.Manga Rajli, S/o V.Ch. Ramana ,Hindu, R/o D.N 0.5-48-7, Chittivalasa 4 Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam District 2. M/s United India Insurance Company Limited, rep. by its Divisional Manager, Branch Office-Ill, 1st Floor, 0pp. APSEB Office, Waltair Main road, Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: M/s N. (P) ANJANA DEVI Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : SRI N RAMA KRISHNA The Court made the following: i APHC010081142005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Thursday, the First Day of May Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No : 2106 of 2005 Between: ...Appellant Lodagala Appayyamma and ...Respondents V.Manga Raju and others Counsel for the appellant: 1. N (P) Anjana Devi Satyanarayana Counsel for the respondents : I.N.Rama Krishna The Court made the following: 2 BSB, J M.A.C.M.A.No.2106 of 2005 Judgment: This appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation challenging the award and decree dated 30.06.2005 in M.O.P No.66 of 2004 on the file of VII Additional District Judge-cum-Motor Vehicles Accident Tribunal, Visakhapatnam. 1. Since it was represented that the learned counsels for the appellant expired, notice was ordered to the appellant through the Registry of this Court. Notice sent to the appellant was returned un-served with the endorsement ‘addressee un-traced’, though it was sent to the address as given in the appeal. Deeming it to be sufficient service, as there is no representation the appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. 2. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal shall stand closed. SD/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The VII Additional District Judge-cum-Motor vehicles accidents Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District [with records if any] 2. One CC to M/s. N. (P) ANJANA DEVI, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI N RAMA KRISHNA, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Sectfon Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati 5. Three CD Copies MV PRK HIGH COURT DATED: 01j05/2025 JUDGMENT MACMA.NO.2106 of 2005 DISMISSINp THE MAGMA FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS