UMESH S/O VENUGOPAL BAHETI v. DEORAO S/O AMRUTAJI GAIKWAD and ANOR.
APEAL/351/2007 · 2025-03-27
Urmila Joshi Phalke
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51013 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51013 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 935.apeal.351.2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.351 OF 2007
Umesh s/o Venugopal Baheti Vs. Deorao s/o Amrutaji Gaikwad and another
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. C. A. Joshi, Counsel for the appellant. Mr. P. S. Gawai, Counsel for the respondent No.1.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.
DATED : 27/03/2025
1. The appeal against acquittal. During the pendency of the appeal, both parties arrived at a settlement between them. The appellant has shown his readiness to accept the demand draft of Rs.50,000/- accordingly, the said demand draft bearing No.593756 is handed over before the Court to the appellant. The appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
2. Appeal is disposed of in view of the settlement.
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) Sarkate 2025:BHC-NAG:3449