RAM SINGH BALMIKI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME, SECRETARIAT COMPLEX GOVT. OF U.K. DEHRADUN
C482/600/2023 · 2025-07-02
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5101 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5101 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
C482 No.600 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Rishabh Bisht, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate for the applicant.
2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State.
3. None is present for respondent no.2.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant made a statement at Bar that the applicant who was the accused has expired during the pendency of present C482 application.
5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present C482 application has rendered infructuous. The same is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
02.07.2025 Ravi