- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50422 WP No. 7184 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 7184 OF 2014 (SCST) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. LOKESH S/O. SEENAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT. YELLAMMANAPALYA VILLAGE DODDA HAGADE DHAKALE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT 3 562 106. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. LOKESH, ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI. N H BHASKAR REDDY S/O N.H.P SHIVAREDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.672, 17TH "C" MAIN 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE 3 560 034. 2. SRI N.H.R. PRASAD REDDY S/O N.H.P SHIVAREDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT. NO. C-17, KUDUREMUKH COLONY, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE 3 560 034. REP: BY HIS GPA HOLDER Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50422 WP No. 7184 of 2014 SRI. B.V. BHASKAR, S/O B.V. VENKATESH, NO.10/974, 13TH "A" MAIN ROAD, HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE 3 560 038. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE 3 560 009. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT DISTRICT COMMISSIONER OFFICE, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE 3 560 009. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SESHU V, HCGP FOR R3 & R4; SRI. A MOHAMMED TAHIR, ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING PROPOSED RESPONDENT ON I.A.2/24; SRI. SHARATH S GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED RESPONDENT ON I.A.1/24; R1 IS SERVED; R23NOTICE HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DATED 17/10/2019) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS IN SC.ST(A)/21/2012-13 ON THE FILE OF 4TH RESPONDENT HEREIN UNDER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50422 WP No. 7184 of 2014 ORAL ORDER 1. It is noticed that the memo of retirement of earlier counsel was accepted and the name of the petitioner was shown in the cause list. There are no steps taken for representation on behalf of the said parties in this petition, as well as in W.P No.7182/2014. 2. In light of the same, while noticing that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the proceedings and despite the matter being of the year 2014, there is no representation by learned counsel, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending I.A9s are disposed of as not calling for adjudication in light of dismissal of the petition. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE UN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0