Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50998 (KAR)

M KALEEM AHMED v. MARIYANNA

WP/35675/2024 · 2025-11-04

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44506 WP No. 35675 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO.35675 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. M.KALEEM AHMED S/O.LATE ABDUL HYE AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NAGASAMUDRA VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 2. M. RAFEEQ AHMED S/O.LATE ABDUL HYE AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NAGASAMUDRA VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 3. M.HABEEB UR RAHMAN S/O.LATE ABDUL HYE AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT MUBARAK MUHALLA MOLAKALMURU TOWN MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 4. M.SALEEM AHMED S/O.LATE ABDUL HYE AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NAGASAMUDRA VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 &PETITIONERS (BY SRI MD.ABRAR S., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44506 WP No. 35675 of 2024 AND: 1. MARIYANNA S/O.LATE AJJAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 2. APPANNI S/O.LATE AJJAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 3. NAGENDRAPPA S/O.LATE AJJAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 4. MARAPARAMESHWARAPPA S/O.LATE NAGABHUSHANAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 5. THIMMAPPA S/O.LATE NAGABHUSHANAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 6. NAGAMMA W/O.LATE NAGABHUSHANAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44506 WP No. 35675 of 2024 7. RATNAMMA W/O.LATE RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 8. VANAJAKSHI W/O.LATE MEGHANATH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 9. PRATHIMA W/O.HARISH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS SADHANA POULTRY FARM BHAIRAPURA MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 10. NAGAPPA S/O.LATE MARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 11. THIPPAKKA W/O.GANGANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 12. NAGAMMA W/O.NAGANNA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44506 WP No. 35675 of 2024 13. KOLLAMMA W/O.LATE CHANNABASAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 14. NAGARAJAPPA S/O.LATE UDUMARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 15. JAYAPPA S/O.LATE UDUMARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 16. M.BASAVARAJ S/O.LATE UDUMARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 17. KRISHNAPPA S/O.LATE UDUMARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 18. HANUMAKKA W/O.LATE SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT GUDDADA HALLI VILLAGE MOLAKALMURU TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 535 - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44506 WP No. 35675 of 2024 19. KENCHAKKA W/O.GANGADHAR S/O.GIDDA NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT ANDRAL VILLAGE BALLARI TALUK & DISTRICT-583 101 &RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE TRIAL COURT VIZ., ITINERARY SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHALAKERE IN O.S.NO.219/2022 TO DISPOSE OF IA.NO.2 FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(d) READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC ON 27.10.2023, WHICH WAS HEARD AND THE MATTER WAS POSTED FOR ORDERS ON IA, WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD AS IA.NO.2 IS PENDING CONSIDERATION SINCE PAST ONE YEAR VIDE ANNEXURE-F. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel for petitioner. 2. The prayer sought in this petition by the petitioners, who are defendants before the trial Court is as follows: "i. May pleased be issue Order or directing the trail court viz., Hon'ble Itinerary Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Chalakere, in O.S. No. 219/2022 to dispose of IA No. 2 U/or VII Rule 11(d) R/w. sec 151 was heard and - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44506 WP No. 35675 of 2024 matter was posted for orders on I.A. on 27-10-2023 within a reasonable period as the I.A. NO. 2 is pending consideration since past 1 year, in the interest of justice and equity. [Annexure-'F']; ii. Issue any other appropriate Writ or Order or Direction which deems fit to pass, by this Hon'ble Court under the facts and circumstances of the Case." 3. This Court does not find any need or necessity to issue notice to the respondents as no adverse orders is passed against the respondents. 4. The respondents-plaintiffs have filed a suit before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Challakere, which is registered and thereafter made over the case to the Itinerary Court, Molakalmuru. In the said suit, the petitioners-defendants filed an application under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC, the matter was posted for objections to the said application, and the same was also filed. Thereafter, the matter was heard in detail and posted for - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44506 WP No. 35675 of 2024 orders on 14.06.2025. However, no orders have been passed on the said application. Hence, the petitioners- defendants are before this Court seeking a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the said application as early as possible. 5. It appears that the petitioners-defendants and the respondents-plaintiffs have addressed their arguments on the application filed under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC. Despite hearing both sides and posting the matter for orders on 14.06.2025, no orders are passed. Therefore, the matter calls for interference in the form of diretion. Accordingly, I pass the following: ORDER i) This Writ Petition is allowed; ii) The Itinerary Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Molakalmuru is directed to pass orders on IA.No.2 filed under Order VII Rule 11(d) read with Section 151 of CPC in O.S.No.219/2022 within a period of - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44506 WP No. 35675 of 2024 two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order; iii) Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE LB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35