IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 CRM-M-23632-2025 Date of Decision: 02.05.2025 DILAWAR SINGH ......... Peoner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Pardhuman Garg, Advocate and Mr. Kanav Goyal, Advocate, for the peoner. Ms. Navreet Kaur Barnala, AAG, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) The present peon has been filed under Secon 482 BNSS, 2023 read with Secon 528 of BNSS, 2023 for seeking Blanket Ancipatory bail with a further prayer for issuance of direcons to respondents to serve 15 days prior noce to the peoner. 2. To substanate his submissions, he has cited a judgment passed by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court in Sukhdev Singh Versus State of Punjab and others, CRM-M- 31442-2021, decided on 12.10.2021. 3. A perusal of the aforesaid judgment clearly reflects that in that case the relief was granted in a specific context as allegaon was against police official for pressurising to pay Rs.1,90,000/-, as such, co-ordinate Bench of this Court directed that if any FIR is registered for an amount of Rs.1,90,000/- to be recovered from the peoner (Sukhdev Singh), in that case, seven days advance noce would be given. Thus, on the facts and law, the said judicial precedents does not apply to the case of peoner. The law is se;led that a blanket bail cannot be granted, as such, present peon is liable to be dismissed. 4. At this stage, counsel for the peoner submits that he be permi;ed to make a representaon to the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police. JYOTI 2025.05.07 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-23632-2025 -2- 5. Given above, the present peon is dismissed with clarificaon that in case, the peoner files a representaon to the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police within a week from today i.e. by 10.05.2025, then the same shall be decided by the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police on or before 25.05.2025 either himself or by authorizing and delegang it to any officer holding IPS cadre. It is clarified that such order must be a reasoned order, and the same be communicated to the representaonists without delay. All pending miscellaneous applicaons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 02.05.2025 Jyo -II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2025.05.07 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.