Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 112
Dalbir Singh Teji
Alok Shekhar, IAS, Justice and Jail Department, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Sector Chandigarh and others
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
proceedings the order dated Bench of this Court in CWP vs. State of Punjab and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of with a direction recommendation of the DPC Dated 08.1.2018 and take action in accordance with law as required keeping in view the recommendation made therein. Let the order be complied with within a period of eight weeks of the receipt of copy of this order.” COCP-2079-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2079 of 2025
Date of decision : Dalbir Singh Teji Versus Alok Shekhar, IAS, Home Secretary, Deptt. of Home Affairs, Justice and Jail Department, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Sector Chandigarh and others
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Krishan Singh Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent the order dated 30.7.2024 (Annexure P- ch of this Court in CWP-14926-2021 vs. State of Punjab and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of with a direction “…..to open the sealed cover keeping in view the recommendation of the DPC Dated 08.1.2018 and take action in accordance with law as required keeping in view the recommendation made therein. Let the order be complied with within a period of eight weeks of the receipt of copy of this order.”
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2079 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-09.07.2025 …..Petitioner Home Secretary, Deptt. of Home Affairs, Justice and Jail Department, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Sector-1, …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Krishan Singh Dadwal, Advocate Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent(s) for not complying -1) passed by a co-ordinate 2021 titled as “Dalbir Singh Teji vs. State of Punjab and others”, vide which the petition was disposed
“…..to open the sealed cover keeping in view the recommendation of the DPC Dated 08.1.2018 and take appropriate action in accordance with law as required keeping in view the recommendation made therein. Let the order be complied with within a period of eight weeks of the receipt of copy of this order.” VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.10 11.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
submits that in compliance of order dated 30.7.2024 (Annexure P passed by this Court, Speaking Order dated 02.5.2025 has been passed by the competent authority.
necessary compliance has bee dated 02.5.2025 by the competent authority; thus, no cause survives in the present petition.
the learned counsel for the respondent thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper
does not press the present petition any further. counsel for the petitioner prays that in case the petitioner is aggrieved of the said order dated 02.5.2025 he may be permitted to assail the same in accordance with law.
aforesaid Speaking Order dated 02.5.2025 as per law.
July 09, 202 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2079-2025 (O & M) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petit submits that in compliance of order dated 30.7.2024 (Annexure P passed by this Court, Speaking Order dated 02.5.2025 has been passed by the competent authority.
Learned counsel for the respondent necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 02.5.2025 by the competent authority; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. Copy of the aforesaid order dated 02.5.2025 produced by the learned counsel for the respondent-State is taken on record. C thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition any further. counsel for the petitioner prays that in case the petitioner is aggrieved of the said order dated 02.5.2025 he may be permitted to assail the same in accordance with law. Dismissed as not pressed. The petitioner would be at liberty to challeng aforesaid Speaking Order dated 02.5.2025 as per law. Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Reportable Yes / No
2 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of order dated 30.7.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court, Speaking Order dated 02.5.2025 has been
Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that n made, while passing a speaking order dated 02.5.2025 by the competent authority; thus, no cause survives in Copy of the aforesaid order dated 02.5.2025 produced by State is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper-book. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition any further. However, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that in case the petitioner is aggrieved of the said order dated 02.5.2025 he may be permitted to assail the The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Speaking Order dated 02.5.2025 as per law. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.10 11.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document