1 2025:CGHC:51010 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 11787 of 2025 Kedarnath Sharma S/o Late Shri Ishwar Prasad Sharma Aged About 55 Years Working As Assistant Grade-3, Nagar Panchayat, Kota, District- Bilaspur C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2. The Director, Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development Department, Indravati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3. The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Kota, District- Bilaspur C.G. 4. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Posted As Assistant Grade-3, Nagar Palika Parishad, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil S Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiyan, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 14/10/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred the writ petition against the order dated 18.09.2025 passed by respondent No. 1 by which the petitioner has been transferred from Nagar Panchayat Kota to Nagar Panchayat Malhar. 2. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has some personal difficulty and he is having 82 years of old mother with him and she is suffering from paralysis. He would further submit that the present place of posting is 60 SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.10.15 10:39:28 +0530 2 KM away from Kota and there is no such proper medical facility at Malhar for treatment of her mother and would pray for quashing of impugned transfer order. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would opposes the submission and would submit that personal difficult is not ground for quashing of the impugned transfer order and would pray for dismissal of the petition. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner has some personal difficulty but it is not ground to be interfered in the impugned transfer order, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to make representation before the respondents who in-turn shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order in accordance with the law. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Santosh