2025:UHC:2960-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA 23RD APRIL, 2025 WRIT PETITION (CRL) No. 311 OF 2025 Smt. Zeenat Bie and another. …Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners. : Sri Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel. Counsel for respondent nos. 1 & 2. : Sri S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. JUDGMENT : (per Sri G. Narendar, C.J.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. Bilal Ahmed, and the learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand Sri S.S. Chauhan. 2. It is submitted that both the petitioners belong to the same community, and that the petitioners developed a liking for each other, which has ended in marriage, and now both the petitioners are living together. Since the family members and others relatives of the first petitioner are against this marriage, they are giving out threats to kill both the petitioners. Petitioners submit that they are facing stiff resistance, and they seriously apprehend threat to their life and limb from the 2025:UHC:2960-DB 2 family and other relatives of the first petitioner, and hence they are before this Court praying for protection. 3. The documents on record reveal that both the petitioners are major, and it is also submitted by the learned Deputy Advocate General for the State that the parties have performed their marriage on 07.04.2025, which fact is also evident from the Nikahnamah produced as Annexure No. 3 to the Writ Petition dated 07.04.2025. 4. In that view of the matter, and in view of the ruling of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and another1, the petitioners have made out a case for grant of protection. 5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Dineshpur, District Udham Singh Nagar is directed to assess the threat, if any, to the life and limb of the petitioners, and provide necessary protection, if it is found that there is a threat to the life and limb of the petitioners. The SHO is further directed to summon the private respondents, and such other persons, who are inimically placed towards the marriage of the petitioners, and counsel them, in accordance with law. 1 (2006) 5 SCC 475 2025:UHC:2960-DB 3 6. The Writ Petition stands ordered accordingly. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. _____________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 23rd April, 2025 Rahul Digitally signed by RAHUL PRAJAPATI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=aa4fa3bee6691397758b14516ed3e66e61bf4c848741983ed8c39 e4145cf1dab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=303B55CC3063D34AC45BF8A192FCAD15C390A1AAD7B3 9857D2540AE4C28A4898, cn=RAHUL PRAJAPATI Date: 2025.04.28 15:59:35 +05'30'