1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1099 of 2016 Ashok Kumar Sahu S/o Mansharam Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Quarter No. 4/C, Sadak No.6, Sector-6, Bhilai Nagar, Police Station- Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant/Complainant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate, Durg, Chhattisgarh., 2 - Krishna Kumar Singh Sikarwar S/o Jagannath Singh Aged About 73 Years R/o Nayapara, Titurdih, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., 3 - Naveen Singh S/o Prahlad Singh R/o Guru Chhaya, Priyadarshani, Risali Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., 4 - Sunil Kumar Soni S/o Sitaram Soni R/o Gandhi Chowk, Krishna Nagar, Supela, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., 5 - Ujjaval Shrivastava S/o Sudhir Shrivastava R/o Near Purana Shiv Mandir, Vaishalinagar, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., 6 - Anil Kumar Sinha S/o Mohan Sinha R/o House No. 13/7, Radhika Nagar, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., 7 - Raju Khan S/o Afaq Hussain Aged About 33 Years R/o Chandranagar, Kohaka, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., 8 - Javed Khan S/o Umar Khan Aged About 46 Years R/o Smriti Nagar, Junwani, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh. (died and deleted) 9 - Farhan Khan S/o Majahar Khan R/o Faridnagar, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., 10 - Abdul Mukhtar S/o Abdul Jabbar Aged About 56 Years R/o Faridnagar, Niyaji Chowk, Supela Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicants/Accused For Applicant : Shri Vidya Bhushan Soni appears on behalf of Shri B.P.Singh, Advocate. For Respondent 1/State : Shri Amit Buxy, P.L. For Respondent 2 : Shri Mayank Gupta appears on behalf of Shri Anurag Singh, Advocate. Digitally signed by ALLENA ANJANI KUMAR Date: 2025.10.14 17:06:50 +0530 2 For Respondents 4 to 7 : Shri Mayank Mulchandani appears on behalf of Shri P.R.Patankar, Advocate. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Order on Board 14/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that during pendency of this revision, criminal case has already been decided by the learned trial Magistrate, therefore, the instant criminal revision filed by the complainant has become infructuous. 2. In view of above submission, this Criminal Revision is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 3. Record be sent to the concerned Court. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE Anjani