1 2025:CGHC:57425 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6188 of 2025 1 - Jaidev Saha S/o Late Shri Gaurang Saha Aged About 60 Years Caste- Namoshudra, Village- Kerwashila-Krishna-Nagar, Tahsil- Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Balrampur-Ramanuganj, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar Tahsil Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Anurag Tripathi, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon’ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 26/11/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the concerned respondent authorities particularly Respondent no. 2 and 4 to decide pending application for correction of the land in the online map revenue record within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 2 10.2 Any other relief, which the Hon’ble court may deem &t and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is not challenging any particular order of respondent authorities, but is seeking direction to concerned respondent authorities to expeditiously decide the pending application for correcting the land of the petitioner in online map in online revenue records. 3. Learned counsel for the State raised no objection in this regard. 4. I have heard learned counsel for respective parties. 5. Considering entire facts and circumstances of case and submission made by counsel for respective parties, Respondent no. 2/Collector, Balrampur-Ramanujganj and Respondent no. 4/Tahsildar, Ramanujganj are directed to decide pending application (Annexure P/1), subject to verification of the facts, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of this case. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY