Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5097 (KER)

JAYALAKSHMI R., v. STATE OF KERALA,

WP(C)/11615/2025 · 2025-03-24

Ziyad Rahman A A

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:KER:26092 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 3RD CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 11615 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: JAYALAKSHMI R., AGED 60 YEARS WIFE OF VEERACHANDRAN, 37/1127A, SOUMYA NAGAR, ELAMKULAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,KOCHI, PIN - 682017 BY ADV B.SAJEEV KUMAR RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695001 2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KOCHI, PIN - 682001 3 THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR), COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KOCHI, PIN - 682030 4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, POONITHURA VILLAGE OFFICE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KOCHI, PIN - 682019 5 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, VYTILLA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KOCHI, PIN - 682019 W.P.C No. 11615 of 2025 2 2025:KER:26092 OTHER PRESENT: Smt.Amminikutty.K, Sr.G.P THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.C No. 11615 of 2025 3 2025:KER:26092 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the owner of the property having an extent of 5 Ares 26 Sq. Meters comprised in Sy.No.235/1-6 in Block No.001 of Poonithura Village in Ernakulam District. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the said property has been described as “Paddy Land” in the revenue records, even though the same has been already removed from the Data Bank as per Ext.P1 order dated06.04.2024. In such circumstances the petitioner submitted Ext.P2 application in Form 6 and it is now pending consideration since 07.08.2024. The limited prayer sought by the petitioner is to direct the 3rd respondent to pass orders thereon within a time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition. Accordingly, it is ordered that the 4th respondent shall forward a report regarding the nature of the property of the petitioner to the 3rd respondent, the authorized officer under Section 2(xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and W.P.C No. 11615 of 2025 4 2025:KER:26092 Wetland Act, 2008, within a period one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment and thereupon, the orders shall be passed by the 3rd respondent, the authorized officer as referred to above, on Ext. P2 application in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of such report. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE rpk W.P.C No. 11615 of 2025 5 2025:KER:26092 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11615/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16/04/2024 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF FORM 6 APPLICATION DATED 07/08/2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT