Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50969 (AP)

Kota Lakshmi Satyanarayana ( Died) as per L.R P2 v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/29872/2021 · 2025-12-07

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010498062021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 29872/2021 Between: 1. KOTA LAKSHMI SATYANARAYANA ( DIED) AS PER L.R P2, S/O. BAPANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 16-3-32, SHARAF BAZAR, TENALI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522 201. 2. KOTA JAYA LAKSHMI MANIKYAM, W/O LATE KOTA LAKSHMI SATYANARAYANA, DOOR NO.18-5-3, SALI PETA, TENALI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522 201. PETITIONER NO.2 IS BROUGHT ON RECORD AS L.RS OF THE DECEASED 1ST PETITIONER AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.19.11.2025 IN I.A.NO.01 OF 2025 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR COLLECTOR OFFICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TENALI TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, TENALI MUNICIPALITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. BHAVIRISELLI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, S/O. B VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2-36-28, PREETHICA ENCLAVE, PARUCHURI STREET, GANDHINAGAR, NANDULAPETA, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the HN, J W.P.No.29872_2021 2 High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents are transferred the property ownership rights to the unofficial 5th respondent herein in an extent of 20.7 Sq Yds shop situated at D.No. 16-3-32, Salipet, Revenue Ward No. 10, Tenali, Guntur District., as illegal, arbitrary, against well settled principles of natural justice, unreasonable and violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to suspend the transferred property ownership rights in Application No. 07064-2020-UK on dated 22.07.2020 in an extent of 20.7 Sq Yds shop situated at D.No. 16-3-32, Salipet, Revenue Ward No. 10, Tenali, Guntur District., and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to suspend the transferred property ownership rights in Application No. 07064-2020-UK on dated 22.07.2020 in an extent of 20.7 Sq. Yds shop situated at D.No. 16-3-32, Salipet, Revenue Ward No. 10, Tenali, Guntur District., pending disposal of the Writ petition, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Permit to bring LR of the Deceased Petitioner In main Writ Petition 29872 of 2021 since the Petitioner No. 1 died on 03.10.2023, leaving behind the proposed Lr Petitioner 2 as his legal representative LR. and grant such other relief or reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VINODIN RUTH MADAPALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY 2. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities 3. GP FOR REVENUE 4. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV HN, J W.P.No.29872_2021 3 The Court made the following order: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition, in order to enable the petitioner to avail and work out appropriate and efficacious alternative remedies available to them under law in respect of the subject matter of the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty to the petitioner to avail such other remedies as may be open to them in accordance with law, including filing a fresh petition, if so required. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 08.12.2025 NKA HN, J W.P.No.29872_2021 4 269 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.29872 of 2021 Date: 08.12.2025 NKA