Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50958 (AP)

SAMPASANI VENKATESWARLU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/20759/2024 · 2025-12-21

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010405572024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 20759/2024 Between: 1. SAMPASANI VENKATESWARLU, S/O. S.TIRUPATHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O.KESINENI PALLI VILLAGE, DUPADU POST, TRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CIVIL SUPPLIES, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR CIVIL SUPPLIES, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB COLLECTOR, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. TAHSILDAR, TRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. BHEMISETTY SATYAM, S/O CHINNA KOTAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC- FAIR PRICE SHOP DEALER, R/O.KESINENI PALLI VILLAGE, DUPADU POST, TRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly 4th respondent in not consider my representation dated 02.09.2024 and requested to take action on 5th respondent who is working as fair price shop dealer in my village and he is not distributing the necessary commodities to the villagers and misusing of the same and without there being any authority of law and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and un just, and violative of Articles 14 and 21-A of Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th respondent to consider and decide my representation dated 02.09.2024 in the interest of Justice, pending disposal of the mean Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 20759/2024 ORDER: When the matter is taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner, informed this Court that he submitted a letter dated 17.12.2025 before the Registry for withdrawal, which is placed on record, and hence seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Consequently miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in the Writ Petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date : 22.12.2025 JLV 4 178 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 20759/2024 Date : 22.12.2025 JLV