Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50952 (PNJ)

SATWINDER KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

CWP/3190/2008 · 2025-05-16

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 1122 Satwinder Kaur State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition 02.04.2007 and 22.05.2007 (Annexures P10 and P12) by which representation of the petitioner with regard to recruitment of posts of PCS (Executive Branch) through nomination from Register A time, even be surviving. 2. Learned counsel also unable to establish contact with 3. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, by demonstrating that the 16.05.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3190 Date of decision: Satwinder Kaur Versus of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Shrome Garg, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition 02.04.2007 and 22.05.2007 (Annexures P10 and P12) by which representation of the petitioner with regard to recruitment of posts of PCS (Executive Branch) through nomination from Register A-II was rejected, might not due to eff time, even be surviving. Learned counsel also submits that despite best efforts he has been unable to establish contact with the petitioner. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, by demonstrating that the lis still survives. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3190-2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.05.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY for the petitioner. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the orders dated 02.04.2007 and 22.05.2007 (Annexures P10 and P12) by which representation of the petitioner with regard to recruitment of posts of PCS (Executive Branch) II was rejected, might not due to efflux of submits that despite best efforts he has been Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No for quashing the orders dated 02.04.2007 and 22.05.2007 (Annexures P10 and P12) by which representation of the petitioner with regard to recruitment of posts of PCS (Executive Branch) lux of submits that despite best efforts he has been Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.16 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document