Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 1122
Satwinder Kaur
State of Punjab and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr.
Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate
Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
1.
Prayer made in the present petition 02.04.2007 and 22.05.2007 (Annexures P10 and P12) by which representation of the petitioner with regard to recruitment of posts of PCS (Executive Branch) through nomination from Register A time, even be surviving.
2.
Learned counsel also unable to establish contact with
3.
Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, by demonstrating that the
16.05.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned :
Whether reportable :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-3190 Date of decision:
Satwinder Kaur
Versus
of Punjab and others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Shrome Garg, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition 02.04.2007 and 22.05.2007 (Annexures P10 and P12) by which representation of the petitioner with regard to recruitment of posts of PCS (Executive Branch) through nomination from Register A-II was rejected, might not due to eff time, even be surviving.
Learned counsel also submits that despite best efforts he has been unable to establish contact with the petitioner.
Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, by demonstrating that the lis still survives.
( AMAN CHAUDHARY )
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3190-2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.05.2025
..Petitioner
..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
for the petitioner. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the orders dated 02.04.2007 and 22.05.2007 (Annexures P10 and P12) by which representation of the petitioner with regard to recruitment of posts of PCS (Executive Branch) II was rejected, might not due to efflux of submits that despite best efforts he has been
Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived,
( AMAN CHAUDHARY )
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
for quashing the orders dated 02.04.2007 and 22.05.2007 (Annexures P10 and P12) by which representation of the petitioner with regard to recruitment of posts of PCS (Executive Branch) lux of submits that despite best efforts he has been
Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.16 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document