Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50944 (AP)

S.Nagireddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/5569/2021 · 2025-10-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010095252021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5569/2021 Between: S.NAGIREDDY, S/O PEDAPULLAREDDY, AGED ABOT 60, OCC- CULTIVATION, CHOUTABHIMAVARAM,THAMMINAIDCIPALLI (V), A.S PETA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE -524121. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, A.S PETA POLICE STATION, A.S PETA MANDAL, ATMAKURU DIVISION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. MULA MALAKONDAIAH, ,S/O KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37, OCC- CULTIVATION, CHOUTABHIMAVARAM,THAMMINAIDUPALLI (V), A.S PETA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE -524121 5. MULA LAKSHAMAIAH, , S/O PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66, OCC- CULTIVATION, CHOUTABHIMAVARAM,THAMMINAIDUPALLI (V), A.S PETA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE -524121 6. MARALA LAKSHMI NARASAIAH, ,S/O.VEKAAIH, AGED ABOUT 46, OCC- CULTIVATION, CHOUTABHIMAVARAM,THAMMINAIDUPALLI (V), S PETA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE -524121 7. YATHAM HARI, S/O THIRUPAL, AGED ABOUT 34, OCC- CULTIVATION, CHOUTABHIMAVARAM,THAMMINAIDUPALLI (V), A.S PETA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE -524121 8. YATHAM MASTAN, , S/O VENGAIH, AGED ABOUT 45, OCC- CULTIVATION, CHOUTABHIMAVARAM,THAMMINAIDUPALLI (V), A.S PETA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE -524121 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SRIDHAR REDDY 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI 2. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents No 3 in not taking action against the respondents No 4 to 8 for the offence punishable under Sections 426, 427 basing on the report dated 20.02.2021 presented by the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, in violation of section 155 of Criminal procedure code besides Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondent No.3 to provide necessary police protection to the petitioner's property.” 2. None represented for the Petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that there is a civil dispute pending between the parties and unless there is a direction from the Court, the Police cannot provide protection. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5569 of 2021 Dt.14.10.2025 Dinesh